Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) Options History
Historical options analytics archive for MDGL with monthly max pain, implied volatility, gamma exposure, and put/call data.
108 months of complete options data available.
MDGL monthly aggregates
Month-by-month rollups derived from the daily snapshot archive for MDGL. Volatility and put/call columns are averages across trading days within the month; max pain, net GEX, and net DEX are the end-of-month values (last trading day of the month).
| Month | Days | Avg ATM IV | Avg IV Rank | End Max Pain | End Net GEX | End Net DEX | Avg P/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09 | 21 | 42.7% | 13.7% | $500.00 | $3.6M | -$131.3M | 0.39 |
| 2026-08 | 21 | 40.9% | 10.2% | $500.00 | $4.1M | -$191.8M | 0.72 |
| 2026-07 | 22 | 51.8% | 31.8% | $520.00 | $793.0K | -$65.1M | 0.93 |
| 2026-06 | 21 | 47.1% | 22.6% | $510.00 | $10.3M | -$244.7M | 1.21 |
| 2026-05 | 20 | 47.7% | 23.5% | $460.00 | $6.4M | -$154.6M | 0.35 |
| 2026-04 | 21 | 62.2% | 49.6% | $500.00 | $6.9M | -$226.1M | 0.30 |
This archive aggregates MDGL's daily end-of-day options snapshots into monthly summaries, spanning 2016-07 through 2026-09. Each month rolls up the underlying snapshot archive, which provides continuous end-of-day coverage from 2007 to present: implied-volatility levels, IV rank, and the put/call ratio are time-averaged across the month; total call and put volume are summed; and dealer positioning (net gamma and delta exposure) and the max-pain strike are taken at the month's final trading day. The result is a long-horizon view of how MDGL option pricing, volatility regime, and dealer hedging pressure evolved month over month, useful for backtesting strategy assumptions and for studying volatility-regime shifts around earnings and macro events. The most recent aggregated month (2026-09) shows an average ATM implied volatility near 42.7%, a month-end max-pain strike around $500.00, an average put/call ratio of 0.39.
2026
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep
2025
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2024
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2023
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2022
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2021
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2020
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2019
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2018
Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
2017
2016
Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
Frequently asked MDGL history questions
- How much options history is available for MDGL?
- This archive holds 108 months of MDGL options analytics, spanning 2016-07 through 2026-09. Each entry is a monthly rollup of MDGL's daily end-of-day options snapshot record, which provides continuous coverage from 2007 to present. Use the year-grouped links on this page to jump to any specific month within the MDGL archive.
- What data does each monthly MDGL aggregate contain?
- Every monthly row summarizes that month of MDGL option activity: time-averaged ATM implied volatility and IV rank, the month-end max-pain strike, end-of-month net dealer gamma (GEX) and delta (DEX) exposure, the average put/call ratio, and total call and put volume. For example, 2026-09 recorded an average ATM implied volatility near 42.7%, an average IV rank of 13.7%, a month-end max-pain strike around $500.00, an average put/call ratio of 0.39.
- How is the MDGL options-history archive built and how often does it update?
- The archive is derived from MDGL's daily end-of-day options snapshots, which capture spot, the full listed chain, implied volatility, and dealer-positioning exposures each trading day. Those daily records are rolled up into the monthly summaries shown here and refreshed as new end-of-day data lands. Traders use the long-horizon view to backtest strategy assumptions, study how MDGL's volatility regime shifts around earnings and macro events, and compare current dealer positioning against historical norms.