Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) Probability Analysis
Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) operates in the Basic Materials sector, specifically the Steel industry, with a market capitalization near $5.62B, listed on NYSE, employing roughly 25,000 people, carrying a beta of 2.13 to the broader market. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Led by C. Lourenco Goncalves, public since 1987-11-05.
Snapshot as of Jul 15, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $9.86
- ATM IV
- 82.0%
- IV Rank
- 91.7%
- IV Percentile
- 97.2%
- HV 20-Day
- 57.2%
- IV Skew 25Δ
- 0.010
As of Jul 15, 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) at $9.86 has an ATM IV of 82.0%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$2.32. IV rank is 91.7% (elevated, distribution priced wider than typical). IV percentile is 97.2%. The 25-delta skew is +0.010: roughly symmetric wings. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.
How CLF probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection
Strategy selection on Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 82.0% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.
How to read the CLF probability distribution
The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 82.0% and spot at $9.86, the 1σ band is approximately ±28.3% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 57.2% runs 24.8 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.
CLF risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities
The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.
Trading the CLF distribution
Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With CLF IV rank at 91.7%, the chain is pricing fatter tails than recent realized history; sellers earn the gap on average. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.
Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →
CLF highest implied-volatility contracts
| Type | Strike | Expiration | Volume | OI | IV | Bid | Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALL | $13.00 | Aug 21, 2026 | 6.1K | 3.2K | 83.1% | $0.20 | $0.22 |
| CALL | $14.00 | Aug 21, 2026 | 4.0K | 7.2K | 84.6% | $0.12 | $0.16 |
| CALL | $12.00 | Jul 24, 2026 | 2.1K | 30.6K | 113.1% | $0.11 | $0.13 |
| CALL | $11.00 | Aug 21, 2026 | 114 | 27.4K | 79.2% | $0.57 | $0.60 |
| CALL | $12.00 | Jul 24, 2026 | 2.1K | 30.6K | 113.1% | $0.11 | $0.13 |
| CALL | $13.00 | Aug 21, 2026 | 6.1K | 3.2K | 83.1% | $0.20 | $0.22 |
| CALL | $22.00 | Jan 15, 2027 | 0 | 16.5K | 77.0% | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| CALL | $12.00 | Sep 18, 2026 | 85 | 16.4K | 74.5% | $0.50 | $0.59 |
| CALL | $10.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 962 | 8.3K | 79.6% | $0.15 | $0.17 |
Top 9 contracts from the institutional-grade nightly options scan; ranked by iv within the broader S&P 500/400/600 + ETF universe.
Frequently asked CLF probability analysis questions
- What is the CLF 30-day expected price range?
- As of Jul 15, 2026, with CLF at $9.86 and ATM IV at 82.0%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$2.32, or about $7.54 to $12.18. IV rank is elevated, so the priced distribution is wider than the 1-year typical width.
- What does CLF risk-neutral density tell us?
- Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future CLF price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
- How does CLF ATM IV translate to a probability range?
- ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.