Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management industry, with a market capitalization near $447.56B, listed on NASDAQ, carrying a beta of 1.18 to the broader market. The Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) launched by Invesco on March 10, 1999, which is structured to track the price and yield performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. public since 1999-03-10.

Snapshot as of May 29, 2026.

Spot Price
$739.13
ATM IV
19.8%
IV Rank
33.6%
IV Percentile
59.9%
HV 20-Day
15.9%
IV Skew 25Δ
0.036

As of May 29, 2026, Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) at $739.13 has an ATM IV of 19.8%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$42.04. IV rank is 33.6% (near its 1-year median). IV percentile is 59.9%. The 25-delta skew is +0.036: upside tail priced richer than downside, biasing probability mass above spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How QQQ probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 19.8% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the QQQ probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 19.8% and spot at $739.13, the 1σ band is approximately ±6.8% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 15.9% runs 3.9 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

QQQ risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the QQQ distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

QQQ implied volatility by strike, top contracts ranked by IV in the nightly options scanQQQ Implied Volatility Skew (Top Contracts)15%20%25%30%35%$550$600$650$700$750$800$850$900Strike ($)Implied VolatilityCall IVPut IV
Chart aggregates top-ranked contracts by strike from the institutional-grade nightly options scan. Sparse coverage on long-tail tickers reflects the scan's S&P 500/400/600 + ETF focus.

QQQ highest implied-volatility contracts

TypeStrikeExpirationVolumeOIIVBidAsk
PUT$739.00Jun 1, 202619.5K18413.0%$3.37$3.39
CALL$747.00Jun 4, 202611.3K11916.0%$3.04$3.07
PUT$737.00Jun 1, 202625.9K29913.5%$2.60$2.61
CALL$740.00Jun 2, 202670.0K1.0K15.0%$4.28$4.30
CALL$752.00Jun 1, 202623.4K30010.9%$0.11$0.12
PUT$741.00Jun 1, 20267.7K11012.6%$4.34$4.36
CALL$740.00Jun 2, 202670.0K1.0K15.0%$4.28$4.30
PUT$730.00Jun 8, 20266.4K15018.1%$4.72$4.75
CALL$740.00Jun 1, 202645.9K2.7K12.8%$3.05$3.06
CALL$750.00Jun 18, 20264.0K36.9K19.1%$9.20$9.24

Top 10 contracts from the institutional-grade nightly options scan; ranked by iv within the broader S&P 500/400/600 + ETF universe.

Frequently asked QQQ probability analysis questions

What is the QQQ 30-day expected price range?
As of May 29, 2026, with QQQ at $739.13 and ATM IV at 19.8%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$42.04, or about $697.09 to $781.17.
What does QQQ risk-neutral density tell us?
Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future QQQ price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does QQQ ATM IV translate to a probability range?
ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.