Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) Probability Analysis
Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management industry, with a market capitalization near $510.48B, listed on NASDAQ, carrying a beta of 1.23 to the broader market. Managed by Invesco, the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 functions as an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that commenced operations on March 10, 1999. public since 1999-03-10.
Snapshot as of Aug 28, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $716.25
- ATM IV
- 16.8%
- IV Rank
- 15.7%
- IV Percentile
- 10.7%
- HV 20-Day
- 18.1%
- IV Skew 25Δ
- 0.042
As of Aug 28, 2026, Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) at $716.25 has an ATM IV of 16.8%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$34.50. IV rank is 15.7% (subdued, distribution priced tighter than usual). IV percentile is 10.7%. The 25-delta skew is +0.042: upside tail priced richer than downside, biasing probability mass above spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.
How QQQ probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection
Strategy selection on Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 16.8% and dealer gamma exposure is negative, so dealer hedging amplifies directional moves. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.
How to read the QQQ probability distribution
The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 16.8% and spot at $716.25, the 1σ band is approximately ±5.8% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 18.1% runs 1.3 vol points above current implied, an inverted regime where premium buyers are underpaying.
QQQ risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities
The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.
Trading the QQQ distribution
Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With QQQ IV rank at 15.7%, the chain is pricing tighter tails than recent realized history; buyers get cheaper optionality but need a real catalyst to monetize. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.
Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →
QQQ highest implied-volatility contracts
| Type | Strike | Expiration | Volume | OI | IV | Bid | Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUT | $500.00 | Sep 11, 2026 | 13.1K | 140 | 25.4% | $0.03 | $0.06 |
| PUT | $681.00 | Sep 30, 2026 | 14.0K | 159 | 20.4% | $4.67 | $4.73 |
| PUT | $700.00 | Sep 18, 2026 | 7.5K | 96.8K | 18.3% | $5.45 | $5.50 |
| PUT | $687.00 | Sep 30, 2026 | 14.0K | 225 | 19.9% | $5.58 | $5.65 |
| PUT | $717.00 | Aug 31, 2026 | 32.9K | 846 | 9.4% | $2.80 | $2.83 |
| PUT | $723.00 | Aug 31, 2026 | 12.2K | 382 | 8.8% | $6.53 | $7.08 |
| CALL | $720.00 | Aug 31, 2026 | 53.4K | 9.3K | 9.0% | $0.94 | $0.96 |
| PUT | $660.00 | Dec 18, 2026 | 535 | 196.2K | 23.7% | $12.62 | $12.73 |
| PUT | $722.00 | Aug 31, 2026 | 14.4K | 460 | 8.8% | $6.08 | $6.23 |
| PUT | $715.00 | Aug 31, 2026 | 50.7K | 3.5K | 9.8% | $1.94 | $1.96 |
Top 10 contracts from the institutional-grade nightly options scan; ranked by iv within the broader S&P 500/400/600 + ETF universe.
Frequently asked QQQ probability analysis questions
- What is the QQQ 30-day expected price range?
- As of Aug 28, 2026, with QQQ at $716.25 and ATM IV at 16.8%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$34.50, or about $681.75 to $750.75. IV rank is subdued, so the priced distribution is tighter than the 1-year typical width.
- What does QQQ risk-neutral density tell us?
- Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future QQQ price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
- How does QQQ ATM IV translate to a probability range?
- ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.