Unity Software Inc. (U) Expected Move
Expected move estimates the probable price range for a given period based on at-the-money options pricing. It reflects the market consensus for volatility over the selected timeframe.
Unity Software Inc. (U) operates in the Technology sector, specifically the Software - Application industry, with a market capitalization near $19.44B, listed on NYSE, employing roughly 4,412 people, carrying a beta of 2.02 to the broader market. Unity Software Inc. Led by Matthew Samuel Bromberg, public since 2020-09-18.
Snapshot as of Aug 14, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $46.38
- Expected Move
- 14.9%
- Implied High
- $53.30
- Implied Low
- $39.46
- Front DTE
- 28 days
As of Aug 14, 2026, Unity Software Inc. (U) has an expected move of 14.92%, a one-standard-deviation implied price range of roughly $39.46 to $53.30 from the current $46.38. Expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market's pricing of a ±1σ move. Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within this range under lognormal assumptions, though empirical markets have fatter tails.
U Strategy Sizing to the Expected Move
With Unity Software Inc. pricing an expected move of 14.92% from $46.38, risk-defined strategies sized to the implied range structurally target the modal outcome distribution. Iron condors with wings at the ±1σ expected move boundaries collect premium against the ~68% probability that spot stays inside the range under lognormal assumptions; strangles set wider at ±1.5σ or ±2σ target the tails but pay smaller per-trade premium. Long-vol structures (long straddles, ratio backspreads) profit when realized move exceeds the implied move, the inverse trade: they bet against the lognormal assumption itself, capitalizing on the empirically fatter equity-return tails.
How to read the U implied-range chart
The shaded range above shows the one-standard-deviation implied price band at each listed expiration, derived from ATM implied volatility scaled to days-to-expiration. The front-tenor expected move is 14.92%, anchoring an implied range of approximately $39.46 to $53.30. Under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside that band; 95% fall inside ±2σ; 99.7% inside ±3σ. The empirical equity-return distribution has fatter tails than lognormal, so true tail-outcome frequency is moderately higher than these closed-form numbers suggest.
U expected move and event pricing
Expected move widens with √time: a 5% 30-day move corresponds to roughly a 2.5% 7.5-day move and a 10% 120-day move. U term-structure is in contango (slope 0.010), so longer-dated tenors price in proportionally more vol than √time scaling alone would suggest - typically because long-dated cycles include uncertain macro states. With IV rank at 0.0%, the implied move is at the low end of the typical U range - cheap optionality for buyers, thin premium for sellers.
Sizing U structures to the expected move
Iron condors with wings at ±1σ collect the modal-outcome premium; ±1.5σ widens probability of inside-range to ~87% but cuts collected premium roughly in half. Strangles do the inverse trade - they pay against the same lognormal distribution, profiting when realized exceeds implied. Calendar spreads bet on the slope of the term structure rather than the level. U put/call volume ratio currently at 0.43 indicates speculative call flow dominates - look for upside-skewed sentiment. The expected move is the inputs the chain is pricing, not a forecast - realized moves above or below are normal under any distribution.
Learn how expected move is reported and how to read the data →
Per-expiration expected move for U derived from ATM implied volatility at each listed expiration. Implied high/low bounds are computed as $46.38 × (1 ± expected move %). One standard-deviation range under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside.
| Expiration | DTE | ATM IV | Expected Move | Implied High | Implied Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | 7 | 48.9% | 6.8% | $49.52 | $43.24 |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 14 | 51.9% | 10.2% | $51.09 | $41.67 |
| Sep 4, 2026 | 21 | 51.1% | 12.3% | $52.06 | $40.70 |
| Sep 11, 2026 | 28 | 51.7% | 14.3% | $53.02 | $39.74 |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 35 | 52.7% | 16.3% | $53.95 | $38.81 |
| Sep 25, 2026 | 42 | 55.1% | 18.7% | $55.05 | $37.71 |
| Oct 2, 2026 | 49 | 54.7% | 20.0% | $55.68 | $37.08 |
| Nov 20, 2026 | 98 | 62.4% | 32.3% | $61.38 | $31.38 |
| Jan 15, 2027 | 154 | 60.7% | 39.4% | $64.67 | $28.09 |
| Feb 19, 2027 | 189 | 63.5% | 45.7% | $67.57 | $25.19 |
| May 21, 2027 | 280 | 66.1% | 57.9% | $73.23 | $19.53 |
| Dec 17, 2027 | 490 | 66.8% | 77.4% | $82.28 | $10.48 |
| Jan 21, 2028 | 525 | 67.1% | 80.5% | $83.70 | $9.06 |
| Dec 15, 2028 | 854 | 69.9% | 106.9% | $95.97 | $-3.21 |
Frequently asked U expected move questions
- What is the current U expected move?
- As of Aug 14, 2026, Unity Software Inc. (U) has an expected move of 14.92% over the next 28 days, implying a one-standard-deviation price range of $39.46 to $53.30 from the current $46.38. The expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market consensus for a ±1σ price move.
- What does the U expected move mean for traders?
- Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within ±1 expected move and 95% within ±2 under lognormal assumptions, though equity returns have empirically fatter tails than log-normal predicts. Strategies sized to the expected move (iron condors at ±1σ, strangles at ±1.5σ) target the typical outcome distribution; strategies that profit from tail moves (long-vol structures, ratio backspreads) target the tails the lognormal model under-prices.
- How is U expected move calculated?
- The expected move displayed here is derived from at-the-money implied volatility scaled to the chosen tenor: expected move % is approximately ATM IV times sqrt(T / 365), where T is days to expiration. An equivalent straddle-based form: the ATM straddle (call + put at the same strike) is roughly sqrt(2/pi) times spot times IV times sqrt(T/365), so the implied one-standard-deviation move is approximately 1.25 times ATM straddle divided by spot. The two formulations agree once the sqrt(2/pi) constant is reconciled.