D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Expected Move
Expected move estimates the probable price range for a given period based on at-the-money options pricing. It reflects the market consensus for volatility over the selected timeframe.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) operates in the Technology sector, specifically the Computer Hardware industry, with a market capitalization near $8.36B, listed on NYSE, employing roughly 216 people, carrying a beta of 2.06 to the broader market. Operating globally, D-Wave Quantum Inc. Led by Alan E. Baratz, public since 2020-12-11.
Snapshot as of Jun 30, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $24.02
- Expected Move
- 28.3%
- Implied High
- $30.83
- Implied Low
- $17.21
- Front DTE
- 31 days
As of Jun 30, 2026, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) has an expected move of 28.35%, a one-standard-deviation implied price range of roughly $17.21 to $30.83 from the current $24.02. Expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market's pricing of a ±1σ move. Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within this range under lognormal assumptions, though empirical markets have fatter tails.
QBTS Strategy Sizing to the Expected Move
With D-Wave Quantum Inc. pricing an expected move of 28.35% from $24.02, risk-defined strategies sized to the implied range structurally target the modal outcome distribution. Iron condors with wings at the ±1σ expected move boundaries collect premium against the ~68% probability that spot stays inside the range under lognormal assumptions; strangles set wider at ±1.5σ or ±2σ target the tails but pay smaller per-trade premium. Long-vol structures (long straddles, ratio backspreads) profit when realized move exceeds the implied move, the inverse trade: they bet against the lognormal assumption itself, capitalizing on the empirically fatter equity-return tails.
How to read the QBTS implied-range chart
The shaded range above shows the one-standard-deviation implied price band at each listed expiration, derived from ATM implied volatility scaled to days-to-expiration. The front-tenor expected move is 28.35%, anchoring an implied range of approximately $17.21 to $30.83. Under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside that band; 95% fall inside ±2σ; 99.7% inside ±3σ. The empirical equity-return distribution has fatter tails than lognormal, so true tail-outcome frequency is moderately higher than these closed-form numbers suggest.
QBTS expected move and event pricing
Expected move widens with √time: a 5% 30-day move corresponds to roughly a 2.5% 7.5-day move and a 10% 120-day move. QBTS term-structure is in contango (slope 0.029), so longer-dated tenors price in proportionally more vol than √time scaling alone would suggest - typically because long-dated cycles include uncertain macro states. With IV rank at 29.1%, the implied move is at the low end of the typical QBTS range - cheap optionality for buyers, thin premium for sellers.
Sizing QBTS structures to the expected move
Iron condors with wings at ±1σ collect the modal-outcome premium; ±1.5σ widens probability of inside-range to ~87% but cuts collected premium roughly in half. Strangles do the inverse trade - they pay against the same lognormal distribution, profiting when realized exceeds implied. Calendar spreads bet on the slope of the term structure rather than the level. QBTS put/call volume ratio currently at 0.42 indicates speculative call flow dominates - look for upside-skewed sentiment. The expected move is the inputs the chain is pricing, not a forecast - realized moves above or below are normal under any distribution.
Learn how expected move is reported and how to read the data →
Per-expiration expected move for QBTS derived from ATM implied volatility at each listed expiration. Implied high/low bounds are computed as $24.02 × (1 ± expected move %). One standard-deviation range under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside.
| Expiration | DTE | ATM IV | Expected Move | Implied High | Implied Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | 2 | 110.1% | 8.1% | $25.98 | $22.06 |
| Jul 10, 2026 | 10 | 96.6% | 16.0% | $27.86 | $20.18 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 17 | 96.0% | 20.7% | $29.00 | $19.04 |
| Jul 24, 2026 | 24 | 98.0% | 25.1% | $30.06 | $17.98 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 31 | 99.0% | 28.9% | $30.95 | $17.09 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 38 | 101.9% | 32.9% | $31.92 | $16.12 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 52 | 104.2% | 39.3% | $33.47 | $14.57 |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 80 | 102.2% | 47.8% | $35.51 | $12.53 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 108 | 102.3% | 55.6% | $37.39 | $10.65 |
| Nov 20, 2026 | 143 | 101.5% | 63.5% | $39.28 | $8.76 |
| Jan 15, 2027 | 199 | 100.2% | 74.0% | $41.79 | $6.25 |
| Mar 19, 2027 | 262 | 99.8% | 84.6% | $44.33 | $3.71 |
| Jan 21, 2028 | 570 | 100.6% | 125.7% | $54.22 | $-6.18 |
Frequently asked QBTS expected move questions
- What is the current QBTS expected move?
- As of Jun 30, 2026, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) has an expected move of 28.35% over the next 31 days, implying a one-standard-deviation price range of $17.21 to $30.83 from the current $24.02. The expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market consensus for a ±1σ price move.
- What does the QBTS expected move mean for traders?
- Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within ±1 expected move and 95% within ±2 under lognormal assumptions, though equity returns have empirically fatter tails than log-normal predicts. Strategies sized to the expected move (iron condors at ±1σ, strangles at ±1.5σ) target the typical outcome distribution; strategies that profit from tail moves (long-vol structures, ratio backspreads) target the tails the lognormal model under-prices.
- How is QBTS expected move calculated?
- The expected move displayed here is derived from at-the-money implied volatility scaled to the chosen tenor: expected move % is approximately ATM IV times sqrt(T / 365), where T is days to expiration. An equivalent straddle-based form: the ATM straddle (call + put at the same strike) is roughly sqrt(2/pi) times spot times IV times sqrt(T/365), so the implied one-standard-deviation move is approximately 1.25 times ATM straddle divided by spot. The two formulations agree once the sqrt(2/pi) constant is reconciled.