Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Banks - Regional industry, with a market capitalization near $765.6M, listed on NASDAQ, employing roughly 620 people, carrying a beta of 0.72 to the broader market. Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Peapack-Gladstone Bank that provides private banking and wealth management services in the United States. Led by Robert A. Plante, public since 1999-04-27.

Snapshot as of May 28, 2026.

Spot Price
$43.45
ATM IV
55.1%
IV Rank
16.8%
IV Percentile
20.6%
HV 20-Day
30.8%
IV Skew 25Δ
-0.257

As of May 28, 2026, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) at $43.45 has an ATM IV of 55.1%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$6.86. IV rank is 16.8% (subdued, distribution priced tighter than usual). IV percentile is 20.6%. The 25-delta skew is -0.257: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How PGC probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 55.1% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the PGC probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 55.1% and spot at $43.45, the 1σ band is approximately ±19.0% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 30.8% runs 24.3 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

PGC risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. PGC's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-0.257) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the PGC distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With PGC IV rank at 16.8%, the chain is pricing tighter tails than recent realized history; buyers get cheaper optionality but need a real catalyst to monetize. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

Frequently asked PGC probability analysis questions

What is the PGC 30-day expected price range?
As of May 28, 2026, with PGC at $43.45 and ATM IV at 55.1%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$6.86, or about $36.59 to $50.31. IV rank is subdued, so the priced distribution is tighter than the 1-year typical width.
What does PGC risk-neutral density tell us?
Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future PGC price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does PGC ATM IV translate to a probability range?
ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.