PG&E Corporation (PCG) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

PG&E Corporation (PCG) operates in the Utilities sector, specifically the Regulated Electric industry, with a market capitalization near $44.49B, listed on NYSE, employing roughly 29,010 people, carrying a beta of 0.28 to the broader market. PG&E Corporation operates as a holding company, overseeing the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity and natural gas to its clientele. Led by Patricia Kessler Poppe, public since 1972-06-01.

Snapshot as of Aug 28, 2026.

Spot Price
$16.73
ATM IV
48.9%
IV Rank
63.6%
IV Percentile
88.1%
HV 20-Day
37.4%
IV Skew 25Δ
-0.051

As of Aug 28, 2026, PG&E Corporation (PCG) at $16.73 has an ATM IV of 48.9%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$2.34. IV rank is 63.6% (near its 1-year median). IV percentile is 88.1%. The 25-delta skew is -0.051: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How PCG probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on PG&E Corporation options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 48.9% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the PCG probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where PG&E Corporation spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 48.9% and spot at $16.73, the 1σ band is approximately ±16.9% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 37.4% runs 11.5 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

PCG risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. PCG's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-0.051) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the PCG distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

PCG implied volatility by strike, top contracts ranked by IV in the nightly options scanPCG Implied Volatility Skew (Top Contracts)45%50%55%60%65%$10$12$14$16$18$20$22Strike ($)Implied VolatilityCall IVPut IV
Chart aggregates top-ranked contracts by strike from the institutional-grade nightly options scan. Sparse coverage on long-tail tickers reflects the scan's S&P 500/400/600 + ETF focus.

PCG highest implied-volatility contracts

TypeStrikeExpirationVolumeOIIVBidAsk
CALL$20.00Oct 16, 20266.8K310.0K48.0%$0.25$0.30
CALL$17.50Sep 18, 202644.5K54356.1%$0.55$0.70
PUT$10.00Jun 17, 20277.8K10341.5%$0.12$0.41
CALL$19.00Sep 18, 202611.3K166.9K59.0%$0.23$0.30
CALL$17.50Sep 18, 202644.5K54356.1%$0.55$0.70
CALL$20.00Sep 18, 202616.3K128.6K59.1%$0.10$0.17
CALL$22.00Sep 18, 20262.9K119.4K66.1%$0.03$0.08
CALL$19.00Sep 25, 20264.2K10752.1%$0.18$0.42
CALL$23.00Sep 18, 20263.2K108.4K68.5%$0.03$0.06
CALL$21.00Sep 18, 202619490.9K62.6%$0.03$0.15

Top 10 contracts from the institutional-grade nightly options scan; ranked by iv within the broader S&P 500/400/600 + ETF universe.

Frequently asked PCG probability analysis questions

What is the PCG 30-day expected price range?
As of Aug 28, 2026, with PCG at $16.73 and ATM IV at 48.9%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$2.34, or about $14.39 to $19.07.
What does PCG risk-neutral density tell us?
Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future PCG price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does PCG ATM IV translate to a probability range?
ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.