HYMC Strangle Strategy
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation), in the Basic Materials sector, (Gold industry), listed on NASDAQ.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a gold and silver development company in the United States. The company holds interests in the Hycroft mine that covers an area of approximately 70,671 acres located in the state of Nevada. As of December 31, 2021, its Hycroft mine had measured and indicated mineral resources of 9.6 million ounces of gold, and 446.0 million ounces of silver. Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is headquartered in Winnemucca, Nevada.
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) trades in the Basic Materials sector, specifically Gold, with a market capitalization of approximately $3.99B, a beta of 2.73 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 2.71-58.73, average daily share volume of 3.3M, a public-listing history dating back to 2018, approximately 56 full-time employees. These structural characteristics shape how HYMC stock options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 2.73 indicates HYMC has historically moved more than the broader market, amplifying both the directional payoff and the realized volatility relative to an index-equivalent position.
What is a strangle on HYMC?
A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.
Current HYMC snapshot
As of May 15, 2026, spot at $36.06, ATM IV 100.10%, IV rank 35.22%, expected move 28.70%. The strangle on HYMC below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 34-day expiry.
Why this strangle structure on HYMC specifically: HYMC IV at 100.10% is mid-range versus its 1-year history, so strategy selection should anchor more to the directional thesis than to the IV regime, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 28.70% (roughly $10.35 on the underlying). The 34-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated HYMC expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on HYMC should anchor to the underlying notional of $36.06 per share and to the trader's directional view on HYMC stock.
HYMC strangle setup
The HYMC strangle below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With HYMC near $36.06, the first option leg uses a $38.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed HYMC chain at a 34-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 HYMC shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $38.00 | $3.85 |
| Buy 1 | Put | $34.00 | $3.00 |
HYMC strangle risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$685.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- Unbounded
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$685.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $27.15, $44.85
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- Unbounded
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.
HYMC strangle payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on HYMC. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | +$2,714.00 |
| $7.98 | -77.9% | +$1,916.80 |
| $15.95 | -55.8% | +$1,119.61 |
| $23.93 | -33.6% | +$322.41 |
| $31.90 | -11.5% | -$474.78 |
| $39.87 | +10.6% | -$498.02 |
| $47.84 | +32.7% | +$299.18 |
| $55.81 | +54.8% | +$1,096.37 |
| $63.79 | +76.9% | +$1,893.57 |
| $71.76 | +99.0% | +$2,690.76 |
When traders use strangle on HYMC
Strangles on HYMC are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the HYMC chain.
HYMC thesis for this strangle
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for HYMC extends from approximately $25.71 on the downside to $46.41 on the upside. A HYMC long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current HYMC IV rank near 35.22% is mid-range against its 1-year distribution, so the IV signal is neutral; the strangle thesis on HYMC should anchor more to the directional view and the expected-move geometry. As a Basic Materials name, HYMC options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to HYMC-specific events.
HYMC strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. HYMC positions also carry Basic Materials sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move HYMC alongside the broader basket even when HYMC-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current HYMC chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a strangle on HYMC?
- A strangle on HYMC is the strangle strategy applied to HYMC (stock). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With HYMC stock trading near $36.06, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed HYMC chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
- How are HYMC strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
- Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the HYMC strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 100.10%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$685.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a HYMC strangle?
- The breakeven for the HYMC strangle priced on this page is roughly $27.15 and $44.85 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current HYMC market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 28.70%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a strangle on HYMC?
- Strangles on HYMC are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the HYMC chain.
- How does current HYMC implied volatility affect this strangle?
- HYMC ATM IV is at 100.10% with IV rank near 35.22%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.