Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) Probability Analysis
Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) operates in the Healthcare sector, specifically the Medical - Equipment & Services industry, with a market capitalization near $8.29B, listed on NYSE, employing roughly 2,442 people, carrying a beta of 2.34 to the broader market. Hims & Hers Health, Inc. Led by Andrew Dudum, public since 2019-09-13.
Snapshot as of Jul 15, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $37.18
- ATM IV
- 118.0%
- IV Rank
- 85.4%
- IV Percentile
- 96.8%
- HV 20-Day
- 70.6%
- IV Skew 25Δ
- -0.048
As of Jul 15, 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) at $37.18 has an ATM IV of 118.0%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$12.58. IV rank is 85.4% (elevated, distribution priced wider than typical). IV percentile is 96.8%. The 25-delta skew is -0.048: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.
How HIMS probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection
Strategy selection on Hims & Hers Health, Inc. options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 118.0% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.
How to read the HIMS probability distribution
The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where Hims & Hers Health, Inc. spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 118.0% and spot at $37.18, the 1σ band is approximately ±40.7% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 70.6% runs 47.4 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.
HIMS risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities
The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. HIMS's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-0.048) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.
Trading the HIMS distribution
Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With HIMS IV rank at 85.4%, the chain is pricing fatter tails than recent realized history; sellers earn the gap on average. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.
Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →
HIMS highest implied-volatility contracts
| Type | Strike | Expiration | Volume | OI | IV | Bid | Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALL | $38.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 7.4K | 5.4K | 92.6% | $0.66 | $0.68 |
| CALL | $40.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 6.9K | 11.0K | 97.2% | $0.21 | $0.24 |
| CALL | $39.50 | Jul 24, 2026 | 652 | 132 | 111.8% | $1.66 | $1.81 |
| CALL | $39.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 5.3K | 4.2K | 94.4% | $0.39 | $0.42 |
| CALL | $37.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 3.6K | 4.9K | 91.8% | $1.10 | $1.15 |
| PUT | $36.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 3.3K | 1.3K | 92.5% | $0.48 | $0.54 |
| PUT | $36.00 | Aug 21, 2026 | 1.2K | 454 | 108.1% | $4.25 | $4.45 |
| CALL | $40.00 | Jul 24, 2026 | 2.5K | 6.4K | 112.8% | $1.49 | $1.58 |
| CALL | $36.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 2.4K | 6.7K | 92.5% | $1.69 | $1.75 |
| PUT | $36.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | 3.3K | 1.3K | 92.5% | $0.48 | $0.54 |
Top 10 contracts from the institutional-grade nightly options scan; ranked by iv within the broader S&P 500/400/600 + ETF universe.
Frequently asked HIMS probability analysis questions
- What is the HIMS 30-day expected price range?
- As of Jul 15, 2026, with HIMS at $37.18 and ATM IV at 118.0%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$12.58, or about $24.60 to $49.76. IV rank is elevated, so the priced distribution is wider than the 1-year typical width.
- What does HIMS risk-neutral density tell us?
- Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future HIMS price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
- How does HIMS ATM IV translate to a probability range?
- ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.