Greenland Energy Company Common Stock (GLND) IV/HV History

Comparing implied volatility to historical (realized) volatility reveals whether options are priced rich or cheap relative to actual price movement. Persistent gaps can signal trading opportunities.

Greenland Energy Company Common Stock (GLND) operates in the Energy sector, specifically the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production industry, with a market capitalization near $170.5M, listed on NASDAQ, employing roughly 3 people, carrying a beta of -2.63 to the broader market. Greenland Energy Company, with its corporate headquarters located in Austin, Texas, is primarily focused on identifying and extracting hydrocarbon deposits throughout Greenland. Led by Robert Brooks Price, public since 2026-03-23.

Snapshot as of Oct 14, 2026.

Spot Price
$3.94
ATM IV
151.4%
HV 20-Day
491.5%
HV 60-Day
315.0%

As of Oct 14, 2026, Greenland Energy Company Common Stock (GLND) ATM implied volatility is 151.4%. 20-day realized volatility is 491.5%, producing an IV-HV spread of -340.1 vol points. Realized volatility currently exceeds implied, an inversion that can signal a pending IV expansion.

How GLND iv/hv history Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on Greenland Energy Company Common Stock options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The iv/hv history view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 151.4% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the iv/hv history data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the GLND IV vs HV chart

The dual-line chart below tracks ATM implied volatility (forward-looking, what the chain is pricing) against 20-day realized historical volatility (backward-looking, what actually happened). ATM IV currently prints at 151.4%, against 491.5% realized over the trailing 20 trading days. Implied is currently below realized by 340.1 vol points, an inverted regime where premium buyers are underpaying for the move - rare and often a setup for IV expansion. Persistent IV-above-HV is the variance-risk-premium-positive state typical of equity markets; persistent IV-below-HV is rare and usually marks underpriced vol that often expands.

GLND IV/HV regimes and trade selection

Using GLND vol history alongside the term structure

The IV/HV gap on this page captures the level of premium; the term-structure slope on the volatility page captures its shape across expirations. Backwardation (negative slope -0.167) indicates acute near-term event risk - near-dated tenors price disproportionate vol. Pair the rank read with the slope read with the event calendar to choose the right tenor for the structure.

GLND IV/HV signal in volatility-cycle context

Equity-vol cycles tend to compress and expand on multi-month timeframes: a typical sequence runs low-IV-rank consolidation (months of flat tape, decaying premium) into a vol-expansion catalyst (earnings miss, macro shock, regime change) into elevated-IV-rank stress (premiums fat, dispersion high) back to mean-reverting compression. The ratio of HV-20 (491.5%) to HV-60 (315.0%) gives a second cycle indicator: when 20-day exceeds 60-day, recent realization is running hotter than the trailing-quarter average - typically a sign that recent days have already started expanding vol regardless of where IV rank prints. Use the time series below to spot inflection points: meaningful IV/HV gap closures and openings tend to precede regime shifts by a few sessions.

Learn how implied vs realized volatility is reported and how to read the data →

Daily ATM implied volatility and 20-day realized (historical) volatility for GLND over the last ~31 trading days. The IV-HV gap measures the variance risk premium - when IV trades persistently above realized HV, premium-sellers earn the spread; when IV dips below HV, vol is structurally underpriced.

GLND ATM implied volatility versus 20-day realized volatility over the last several weeksGLND Implied vs Realized Volatility100%200%300%400%09-0110-14Trading DayVolatilityATM IVHV 20d
Daily values from end-of-day option_ticker_snapshots. Series sparse on illiquid tickers reflects gaps in the upstream end-of-day options data feed.

Most recent 15 trading days (descending). Older history appears in the chart above.

DateATM IVHV 20dHV 60dIV Rank
Oct 14, 2026151.4%491.5%315.0%-
Oct 13, 2026195.1%448.8%289.9%-
Oct 12, 2026148.3%447.8%290.0%-
Oct 9, 2026177.4%445.7%289.4%-
Oct 8, 2026163.4%445.4%289.6%-
Oct 7, 2026242.5%444.0%290.1%-
Oct 6, 2026138.7%445.5%289.4%-
Oct 5, 2026130.1%437.5%286.3%-
Oct 2, 2026173.5%436.7%286.6%-
Oct 1, 2026155.0%430.7%284.6%-
Sep 30, 2026169.6%423.7%282.0%-
Sep 29, 2026172.1%423.7%281.4%-
Sep 28, 2026182.3%424.4%281.3%-
Sep 25, 2026199.6%411.3%276.7%-
Sep 24, 2026199.2%412.5%276.9%-

Frequently asked GLND iv/hv history questions

Is GLND options pricing rich or cheap right now?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Greenland Energy Company Common Stock (GLND) ATM IV is 151.4% against 20-day realized volatility of 491.5%. Realized volatility currently exceeds implied: an inversion of the typical equity volatility risk premium that often precedes IV expansion.
What is the GLND variance risk premium?
The variance risk premium is the persistent gap between implied and subsequently realized volatility. In equity markets it averages positive because option sellers demand compensation for bearing variance shocks. GLND is currently pricing inverted to the historical pattern, which is one input to whether short-vol or long-vol structures carry their typical edge.
What does GLND IV rank mean for strategy selection?
IV rank normalizes the current ATM IV to its 1-year range: 0% is the low, 100% is the high. GLND's current rank signals where current pricing sits in its own 1-year history. High-rank regimes typically favor premium-selling structures (credit spreads, condors, covered calls); low-rank regimes typically favor premium-buying or long-volatility structures.