How are CXW strangle max profit and max loss calculated?

Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the CXW strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 59.70%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$190.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.

What is the breakeven for a CXW strangle?

The breakeven for the CXW strangle priced on this page is roughly $27.10 and $33.90 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current CXW market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 17.12%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.

How does current CXW implied volatility affect this strangle?

CXW ATM IV is at 59.70% with IV rank near 64.85%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.

CXW Strangle Strategy

CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.), in the Real Estate sector, (REIT - Specialty industry), listed on NYSE.

CoreCivic, Inc. specializes in the ownership and management of a diverse portfolio of correctional institutions, detention centers, and residential reentry facilities throughout the United States. Its operations are organized into three distinct divisions: CoreCivic Safety, CoreCivic Community, and CoreCivic Properties. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services to its government partners, encompassing the administration of correctional and detention services, the provision of a network of residential reentry centers designed to combat the nation's recidivism challenges, and tailored government real estate solutions. Within these facilities, CoreCivic delivers a range of rehabilitative and educational initiatives, including fundamental schooling, spiritual support, practical life skills and vocational training, and programs for substance abuse recovery. As of the close of 2021, CoreCivic's holdings included 46 correctional and detention sites, 26 residential reentry hubs, and 10 properties designated for leasing. The organization was established in 1983 and maintains its principal offices in Brentwood, Tennessee.

CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.) trades in the Real Estate sector, specifically REIT - Specialty, with a market capitalization of approximately $3.04B, a trailing P/E of 24.56, a beta of 0.64 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 15.74-30.95, average daily share volume of 1.1M, a public-listing history dating back to 1997, approximately 12K full-time employees. These structural characteristics shape how CXW stock options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.

A beta of 0.64 indicates CXW has historically moved less than the broader market, dampening realized volatility and producing tighter expected-move bands per unit of dollar exposure.

What is a strangle on CXW?

A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.

Current CXW snapshot

As of June 30, 2026, spot at $30.69, ATM IV 59.70%, IV rank 64.85%, expected move 17.12%. The strangle on CXW below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 17-day expiry.

Why this strangle structure on CXW specifically: CXW IV at 59.70% is mid-range versus its 1-year history, so strategy selection should anchor more to the directional thesis than to the IV regime, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 17.12% (roughly $5.25 on the underlying). The 17-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated CXW expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on CXW should anchor to the underlying notional of $30.69 per share and to the trader's directional view on CXW stock.

CXW strangle setup

The CXW strangle below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With CXW near $30.69, the first option leg uses a $32.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed CXW chain at a 17-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 CXW shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).

Action	Type	Strike / Basis	Premium (est)
Buy 1	Call	$32.00	$1.10
Buy 1	Put	$29.00	$0.80

CXW strangle risk and reward

Net Premium / Debit: -$190.00
Max Profit (per contract): Unbounded
Max Loss (per contract): -$190.00
Breakeven(s): $27.10, $33.90
Risk / Reward Ratio: Unbounded

Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.

CXW strangle payoff curve

Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on CXW. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.

P&L at expiration across the modeled underlying-price range. Green shading marks profitable regions, red shading marks loss regions. Dotted purple verticals mark breakevens; the solid dark vertical marks current spot.

Underlying Price	% From Spot	P&L at Expiration
$0.01	-100.0%	+$2,709.00
$6.79	-77.9%	+$2,030.54
$13.58	-55.8%	+$1,352.08
$20.36	-33.6%	+$673.61
$27.15	-11.5%	-$4.85
$33.93	+10.6%	+$3.31
$40.72	+32.7%	+$681.77
$47.50	+54.8%	+$1,360.24
$54.29	+76.9%	+$2,038.70
$61.07	+99.0%	+$2,717.16

When traders use strangle on CXW

Strangles on CXW are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the CXW chain.

CXW thesis for this strangle

The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for CXW extends from approximately $25.44 on the downside to $35.94 on the upside. A CXW long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current CXW IV rank near 64.85% is mid-range against its 1-year distribution, so the IV signal is neutral; the strangle thesis on CXW should anchor more to the directional view and the expected-move geometry. As a Real Estate name, CXW options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to CXW-specific events.

CXW strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. CXW positions also carry Real Estate sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move CXW alongside the broader basket even when CXW-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current CXW chain quotes before placing a trade.

Frequently asked questions

What is a strangle on CXW?: A strangle on CXW is the strangle strategy applied to CXW (stock). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With CXW stock trading near $30.69, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed CXW chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
How are CXW strangle max profit and max loss calculated?: Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the CXW strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 59.70%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$190.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
What is the breakeven for a CXW strangle?: The breakeven for the CXW strangle priced on this page is roughly $27.10 and $33.90 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current CXW market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 17.12%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
When should you consider a strangle on CXW?: Strangles on CXW are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the CXW chain.
How does current CXW implied volatility affect this strangle?: CXW ATM IV is at 59.70% with IV rank near 64.85%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.