Nasdaq-100 Micro Index (XND) Expected Move
Expected move estimates the probable price range for a given period based on at-the-money options pricing. It reflects the market consensus for volatility over the selected timeframe.
Snapshot as of May 29, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $302.91
- Expected Move
- 5.7%
- Implied High
- $320.13
- Implied Low
- $285.69
- Front DTE
- 28 days
As of May 29, 2026, Nasdaq-100 Micro Index (XND) has an expected move of 5.68%, a one-standard-deviation implied price range of roughly $285.69 to $320.13 from the current $302.91. Expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market's pricing of a ±1σ move. Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within this range under lognormal assumptions, though empirical markets have fatter tails.
XND Strategy Sizing to the Expected Move
With Nasdaq-100 Micro Index pricing an expected move of 5.68% from $302.91, risk-defined strategies sized to the implied range structurally target the modal outcome distribution. Iron condors with wings at the ±1σ expected move boundaries collect premium against the ~68% probability that spot stays inside the range under lognormal assumptions; strangles set wider at ±1.5σ or ±2σ target the tails but pay smaller per-trade premium. Long-vol structures (long straddles, ratio backspreads) profit when realized move exceeds the implied move, the inverse trade: they bet against the lognormal assumption itself, capitalizing on the empirically fatter equity-return tails.
How to read the XND implied-range chart
The shaded range above shows the one-standard-deviation implied price band at each listed expiration, derived from ATM implied volatility scaled to days-to-expiration. The front-tenor expected move is 5.68%, anchoring an implied range of approximately $285.69 to $320.13. Under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside that band; 95% fall inside ±2σ; 99.7% inside ±3σ. The empirical equity-return distribution has fatter tails than lognormal, so true tail-outcome frequency is moderately higher than these closed-form numbers suggest.
XND expected move and event pricing
Expected move widens with √time: a 5% 30-day move corresponds to roughly a 2.5% 7.5-day move and a 10% 120-day move. XND term-structure is in backwardation (slope -0.002), so near-dated tenors price in disproportionate vol - usually because of a known event in the front-month window.
Sizing XND structures to the expected move
Iron condors with wings at ±1σ collect the modal-outcome premium; ±1.5σ widens probability of inside-range to ~87% but cuts collected premium roughly in half. Strangles do the inverse trade - they pay against the same lognormal distribution, profiting when realized exceeds implied. Calendar spreads bet on the slope of the term structure rather than the level. XND put/call volume ratio currently at 0.96 indicates balanced flow without strong directional skew. The expected move is the inputs the chain is pricing, not a forecast - realized moves above or below are normal under any distribution.
Learn how expected move is reported and how to read the data →
Per-expiration expected move for XND derived from ATM implied volatility at each listed expiration. Implied high/low bounds are computed as $302.91 × (1 ± expected move %). One standard-deviation range under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside.
| Expiration | DTE | ATM IV | Expected Move | Implied High | Implied Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | 3 | 12.6% | 1.1% | $306.37 | $299.45 |
| Jun 2, 2026 | 4 | 15.0% | 1.6% | $307.67 | $298.15 |
| Jun 3, 2026 | 5 | 16.1% | 1.9% | $308.62 | $297.20 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | 6 | 16.9% | 2.2% | $309.47 | $296.35 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | 7 | 17.8% | 2.5% | $310.38 | $295.44 |
| Jun 12, 2026 | 14 | 18.8% | 3.7% | $314.06 | $291.76 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 20 | 19.7% | 4.6% | $316.88 | $288.94 |
| Jun 26, 2026 | 28 | 19.9% | 5.5% | $319.61 | $286.21 |
| Jul 2, 2026 | 34 | 19.7% | 6.0% | $321.12 | $284.70 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 49 | 20.5% | 7.5% | $325.66 | $280.16 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 84 | 21.7% | 10.4% | $334.44 | $271.38 |
| Sep 18, 2026 | 112 | 22.3% | 12.4% | $340.33 | $265.49 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 140 | 22.5% | 13.9% | $345.12 | $260.70 |
| Nov 20, 2026 | 175 | 23.0% | 15.9% | $351.15 | $254.67 |
| Dec 18, 2026 | 203 | 23.1% | 17.2% | $355.09 | $250.73 |
| Jan 15, 2027 | 231 | 23.1% | 18.4% | $358.58 | $247.24 |
| Feb 19, 2027 | 266 | 23.3% | 19.9% | $363.16 | $242.66 |
| Mar 19, 2027 | 294 | 23.4% | 21.0% | $366.52 | $239.30 |
| Apr 16, 2027 | 322 | 23.4% | 22.0% | $369.49 | $236.33 |
| May 21, 2027 | 357 | 23.8% | 23.5% | $374.21 | $231.61 |
| Jun 17, 2027 | 384 | 23.8% | 24.4% | $376.86 | $228.96 |
| Dec 17, 2027 | 567 | 23.8% | 29.7% | $392.76 | $213.06 |
Frequently asked XND expected move questions
- What is the current XND expected move?
- As of May 29, 2026, Nasdaq-100 Micro Index (XND) has an expected move of 5.68% over the next 28 days, implying a one-standard-deviation price range of $285.69 to $320.13 from the current $302.91. The expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market consensus for a ±1σ price move.
- What does the XND expected move mean for traders?
- Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within ±1 expected move and 95% within ±2 under lognormal assumptions, though equity returns have empirically fatter tails than log-normal predicts. Strategies sized to the expected move (iron condors at ±1σ, strangles at ±1.5σ) target the typical outcome distribution; strategies that profit from tail moves (long-vol structures, ratio backspreads) target the tails the lognormal model under-prices.
- How is XND expected move calculated?
- The expected move displayed here is derived from at-the-money implied volatility scaled to the chosen tenor: expected move % is approximately ATM IV times sqrt(T / 365), where T is days to expiration. An equivalent straddle-based form: the ATM straddle (call + put at the same strike) is roughly sqrt(2/pi) times spot times IV times sqrt(T/365), so the implied one-standard-deviation move is approximately 1.25 times ATM straddle divided by spot. The two formulations agree once the sqrt(2/pi) constant is reconciled.