What is the UXRP 30-day expected price range?

As of Jul 15, 2026, with UXRP at $11.18 and ATM IV at 126.6%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$4.06, or about $7.12 to $15.24.

What does UXRP risk-neutral density tell us?

Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future UXRP price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.

How does UXRP ATM IV translate to a probability range?

ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.

ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management - Cryptocurrency industry, with a market capitalization near $29.3M, listed on AMEX, carrying a beta of 2.06 to the broader market. This ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) is designed to provide daily investment returns. public since 2025-07-14.

Snapshot as of Jul 15, 2026.

Spot Price: $11.18
ATM IV: 126.6%
IV Rank: 34.0%
IV Percentile: 16.9%
HV 20-Day: 101.5%
IV Skew 25Δ: -0.199

As of Jul 15, 2026, ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) at $11.18 has an ATM IV of 126.6%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$4.06. IV rank is 34.0% (near its 1-year median). IV percentile is 16.9%. The 25-delta skew is -0.199: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How UXRP probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 126.6% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the UXRP probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where ProShares - Ultra XRP ETF spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 126.6% and spot at $11.18, the 1σ band is approximately ±43.7% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 101.5% runs 25.1 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

UXRP risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. UXRP's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-0.199) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the UXRP distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

Frequently asked UXRP probability analysis questions

What is the UXRP 30-day expected price range?: As of Jul 15, 2026, with UXRP at $11.18 and ATM IV at 126.6%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$4.06, or about $7.12 to $15.24.
What does UXRP risk-neutral density tell us?: Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future UXRP price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does UXRP ATM IV translate to a probability range?: ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.