RSST Strangle Strategy

RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on CBOE.

Tidal Trust II - Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Tidal Investments LLC. The fund is co-managed by Newfound Research LLC, Resolve Asset Management Inc and Resolve Asset Management Sezc. The fund invests in public equity, fixed income, commodity, and currency markets of the United States. For its equity portion, it invests directly, through other funds and through derivatives in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund employs long/short strategy and uses derivatives such as futures to create its portfolio.

RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $510.7M, a beta of 1.13 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 25.86-36.08, average daily share volume of 122K, a public-listing history dating back to 2023, approximately 172 full-time employees. These structural characteristics shape how RSST etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.

A beta of 1.13 places RSST roughly in line with broader market moves, so the strategy payoff and realized volatility track the index-equivalent baseline. RSST pays a dividend, which adjusts put-call parity and shifts the ex-dividend pricing across the listed chain.

What is a strangle on RSST?

A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.

RSST snapshot

As of September 29, 2026, spot at $35.45, ATM IV 232.80%, expected move 66.74%. The strangle on RSST below is built from the September 29, 2026 end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 80-day expiry.

Why this strangle structure on RSST specifically: IV rank is unavailable in the current snapshot, so regime-based timing for RSST is inferred from ATM IV at 232.80% alone, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 66.74% (roughly $23.66 on the underlying). The 80-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated RSST expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on RSST should anchor to the underlying notional of $35.45 per share and to the trader's directional view on RSST etf.

RSST strangle setup

The RSST strangle below is built from the September 29, 2026 end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With RSST at $35.45 on that close, the first option leg uses a $37.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed RSST chain at a 80-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 RSST shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).

ActionTypeStrike / BasisPremium (est)
Buy 1Call$37.00$0.68
Buy 1Put$34.00$0.50

RSST strangle risk and reward

Net Premium / Debit
-$118.00
Max Profit (per contract)
Unbounded
Max Loss (per contract)
-$118.00
Breakeven(s)
$32.82, $38.18
Risk / Reward Ratio
Unbounded

Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.

RSST strangle payoff curve

Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on RSST. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.

RSST strangle profit and loss curve at expiration with breakevens and current spot markedRSST strangle payoff at expiration$0$500$1000$1500$2000$2500$3000$10$20$30$40$50$60$70Underlying Price ($)P&L at Expiration ($)BE $32.82BE $38.18Spot $35.45
P&L at expiration across the modeled underlying-price range. Green shading marks profitable regions, red shading marks loss regions. Dotted purple verticals mark breakevens; the solid dark vertical marks current spot.
Underlying Price% From SpotP&L at Expiration
$0.01-100.0%+$3,281.00
$7.85-77.9%+$2,497.29
$15.68-55.8%+$1,713.58
$23.52-33.6%+$929.87
$31.36-11.5%+$146.17
$39.20+10.6%+$101.54
$47.03+32.7%+$885.25
$54.87+54.8%+$1,668.96
$62.71+76.9%+$2,452.67
$70.54+99.0%+$3,236.38

When traders use strangle on RSST

Strangles on RSST are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the RSST chain.

RSST thesis for this strangle

The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for RSST extends from approximately $11.79 on the downside to $59.11 on the upside. A RSST long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. As a Financial Services name, RSST options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to RSST-specific events.

RSST strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. RSST positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move RSST alongside the broader basket even when RSST-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current RSST chain quotes before placing a trade.

Frequently asked questions

What is a strangle on RSST?
A strangle on RSST is the strangle strategy applied to RSST (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With RSST etf at $35.45 on the September 29, 2026 close, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed RSST chain strike and the premiums come straight from that session's bid/ask midpoint.
How are RSST strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the RSST strangle priced from the September 29, 2026 end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 232.80%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$118.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
What is the breakeven for a RSST strangle?
The breakeven for the RSST strangle priced on this page is roughly $32.82 and $38.18 at expiration, derived from the September 29, 2026 end-of-day chain's premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The RSST market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move in the same options snapshot is approximately 66.74%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
When should you consider a strangle on RSST?
Strangles on RSST are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the RSST chain.
How does current RSST implied volatility affect this strangle?
Current RSST ATM IV is 232.80%; IV rank context is unavailable in the current snapshot.

Related RSST analysis