MJ Strangle Strategy
MJ (Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on AMEX.
The Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF, identified by the ticker MJ, aims to replicate the overall financial performance of the Prime Alternative Harvest Index, before accounting for any associated fees or expenses. The fund accomplishes this by investing in a range of companies within the global cannabis industry, specifically those positioned to capitalize on the growing worldwide trend of legalizing cannabis for both medical and recreational purposes.
MJ (Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $120.8M, a beta of 0.82 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 21.05-46.75, average daily share volume of 41K, a public-listing history dating back to 2015. These structural characteristics shape how MJ etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 0.82 places MJ roughly in line with broader market moves, so the strategy payoff and realized volatility track the index-equivalent baseline. MJ pays a dividend, which adjusts put-call parity and shifts the ex-dividend pricing across the listed chain.
What is a strangle on MJ?
A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.
MJ snapshot
As of August 14, 2026, spot at $25.14, ATM IV 44.50%, IV rank 4.09%, expected move 12.76%. The strangle on MJ below is built from the August 14, 2026 end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 35-day expiry.
Why this strangle structure on MJ specifically: MJ IV at 44.50% is on the cheap side of its 1-year range, which favors premium-buying structures like a MJ strangle, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 12.76% (roughly $3.21 on the underlying). The 35-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated MJ expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on MJ should anchor to the underlying notional of $25.14 per share and to the trader's directional view on MJ etf.
MJ strangle setup
The MJ strangle below is built from the August 14, 2026 end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With MJ at $25.14 on that close, the first option leg uses a $26.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed MJ chain at a 35-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 MJ shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $26.00 | $1.13 |
| Buy 1 | Put | $24.00 | $0.68 |
MJ strangle risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$180.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- Unbounded
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$180.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $22.20, $27.80
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- Unbounded
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.
MJ strangle payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on MJ. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | +$2,219.00 |
| $5.57 | -77.9% | +$1,663.25 |
| $11.12 | -55.7% | +$1,107.50 |
| $16.68 | -33.6% | +$551.75 |
| $22.24 | -11.5% | -$3.99 |
| $27.80 | +10.6% | -$0.26 |
| $33.35 | +32.7% | +$555.49 |
| $38.91 | +54.8% | +$1,111.24 |
| $44.47 | +76.9% | +$1,666.99 |
| $50.03 | +99.0% | +$2,222.74 |
When traders use strangle on MJ
Strangles on MJ are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the MJ chain.
MJ thesis for this strangle
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for MJ extends from approximately $21.93 on the downside to $28.35 on the upside. A MJ long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current MJ IV rank near 4.09% sits in the lower third of its 1-year distribution, where IV often re-expands toward the mean; this favors premium-buying structures and disadvantages premium-selling structures on MJ at 44.50%. As a Financial Services name, MJ options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to MJ-specific events.
MJ strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. MJ positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move MJ alongside the broader basket even when MJ-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current MJ chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a strangle on MJ?
- A strangle on MJ is the strangle strategy applied to MJ (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With MJ etf at $25.14 on the August 14, 2026 close, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed MJ chain strike and the premiums come straight from that session's bid/ask midpoint.
- How are MJ strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
- Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the MJ strangle priced from the August 14, 2026 end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 44.50%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$180.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a MJ strangle?
- The breakeven for the MJ strangle priced on this page is roughly $22.20 and $27.80 at expiration, derived from the August 14, 2026 end-of-day chain's premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The MJ market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move in the same options snapshot is approximately 12.76%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a strangle on MJ?
- Strangles on MJ are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the MJ chain.
- How does current MJ implied volatility affect this strangle?
- MJ ATM IV is at 44.50% with IV rank near 4.09%, which is on the low end of its 1-year range. Premium-buying structures (long call, long put, debit spreads) are relatively cheap in this regime; premium-selling structures collect less credit per unit risk.