Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) Expected Move
Expected move estimates the probable price range for a given period based on at-the-money options pricing. It reflects the market consensus for volatility over the selected timeframe.
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management industry, with a market capitalization near $386.0M, listed on NASDAQ, carrying a beta of 0.36 to the broader market. The Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (Fund) is based on the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Index (Index). public since 2010-12-22.
Snapshot as of May 14, 2026.
- Spot Price
- $117.84
- Expected Move
- 23.4%
- Implied High
- $145.41
- Implied Low
- $90.27
- Front DTE
- 35 days
As of May 14, 2026, Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has an expected move of 23.39%, a one-standard-deviation implied price range of roughly $90.27 to $145.41 from the current $117.84. Expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market's pricing of a ±1σ move. Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within this range under lognormal assumptions, though empirical markets have fatter tails.
KBWP Strategy Sizing to the Expected Move
With Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF pricing an expected move of 23.39% from $117.84, risk-defined strategies sized to the implied range structurally target the modal outcome distribution. Iron condors with wings at the ±1σ expected move boundaries collect premium against the ~68% probability that spot stays inside the range under lognormal assumptions; strangles set wider at ±1.5σ or ±2σ target the tails but pay smaller per-trade premium. Long-vol structures (long straddles, ratio backspreads) profit when realized move exceeds the implied move, the inverse trade: they bet against the lognormal assumption itself, capitalizing on the empirically fatter equity-return tails.
Learn how expected move is reported and how to read the data →
Per-expiration expected move for KBWP derived from ATM implied volatility at each listed expiration. Implied high/low bounds are computed as $117.84 × (1 ± expected move %). One standard-deviation range under lognormal assumptions, roughly 68% of outcomes fall inside.
| Expiration | DTE | ATM IV | Expected Move | Implied High | Implied Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | 1 | 492.0% | 25.8% | $148.19 | $87.49 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 35 | 81.6% | 25.3% | $147.62 | $88.06 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 64 | 18.1% | 7.6% | $126.77 | $108.91 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 155 | 19.1% | 12.4% | $132.51 | $103.17 |
| Jan 15, 2027 | 246 | 19.5% | 16.0% | $136.70 | $98.98 |
Frequently asked KBWP expected move questions
- What is the current KBWP expected move?
- As of May 14, 2026, Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has an expected move of 23.39% over the next 35 days, implying a one-standard-deviation price range of $90.27 to $145.41 from the current $117.84. The expected move is derived from at-the-money straddle pricing and represents the market consensus for a ±1σ price move.
- What does the KBWP expected move mean for traders?
- Roughly 68% of outcomes should fall within ±1 expected move and 95% within ±2 under lognormal assumptions, though equity returns have empirically fatter tails than log-normal predicts. Strategies sized to the expected move (iron condors at ±1σ, strangles at ±1.5σ) target the typical outcome distribution; strategies that profit from tail moves (long-vol structures, ratio backspreads) target the tails the lognormal model under-prices.
- How is KBWP expected move calculated?
- The expected move displayed here is derived from at-the-money implied volatility scaled to the chosen tenor: expected move % is approximately ATM IV times sqrt(T / 365), where T is days to expiration. An equivalent straddle-based form: the ATM straddle (call + put at the same strike) is roughly sqrt(2/pi) times spot times IV times sqrt(T/365), so the implied one-standard-deviation move is approximately 1.25 times ATM straddle divided by spot. The two formulations agree once the sqrt(2/pi) constant is reconciled.