IQM Strangle Strategy

IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on CBOE.

Franklin Templeton ETF Trust - Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by Franklin Resources, Inc. The fund is managed by Franklin Advisers, Inc. It invests in public equity markets of global region. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across information technology, software and services, software, systems software, automation products and services, software research, artificial intelligence software sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility.

IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $67.4M, a beta of 1.66 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 72.85-126.21, average daily share volume of 8K, a public-listing history dating back to 2020. These structural characteristics shape how IQM etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.

A beta of 1.66 indicates IQM has historically moved more than the broader market, amplifying both the directional payoff and the realized volatility relative to an index-equivalent position.

What is a strangle on IQM?

A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.

Current IQM snapshot

As of June 29, 2026, spot at $118.71, ATM IV 36.80%, IV rank 72.57%, expected move 10.55%. The strangle on IQM below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 18-day expiry.

Why this strangle structure on IQM specifically: IQM IV at 36.80% is rich versus its 1-year range, which makes a premium-buying IQM strangle relatively expensive in absolute-cost terms, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 10.55% (roughly $12.52 on the underlying). The 18-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated IQM expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on IQM should anchor to the underlying notional of $118.71 per share and to the trader's directional view on IQM etf.

IQM strangle setup

The IQM strangle below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With IQM near $118.71, the first option leg uses a $125.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed IQM chain at a 18-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 IQM shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).

ActionTypeStrike / BasisPremium (est)
Buy 1Call$125.00$1.44
Buy 1Put$115.00$2.85

IQM strangle risk and reward

Net Premium / Debit
-$429.00
Max Profit (per contract)
Unbounded
Max Loss (per contract)
-$429.00
Breakeven(s)
$110.71, $129.29
Risk / Reward Ratio
Unbounded

Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.

IQM strangle payoff curve

Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on IQM. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.

IQM strangle profit and loss curve at expiration with breakevens and current spot markedIQM strangle payoff at expiration$0$2000$4000$6000$8000$10000$50$100$150$200Underlying Price ($)P&L at Expiration ($)BE $110.71BE $129.29Spot $118.71
P&L at expiration across the modeled underlying-price range. Green shading marks profitable regions, red shading marks loss regions. Dotted purple verticals mark breakevens; the solid dark vertical marks current spot.
Underlying Price% From SpotP&L at Expiration
$0.01-100.0%+$11,070.00
$26.26-77.9%+$8,445.37
$52.50-55.8%+$5,820.73
$78.75-33.7%+$3,196.10
$105.00-11.6%+$571.47
$131.24+10.6%+$195.17
$157.49+32.7%+$2,819.80
$183.73+54.8%+$5,444.43
$209.98+76.9%+$8,069.07
$236.23+99.0%+$10,693.70

When traders use strangle on IQM

Strangles on IQM are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the IQM chain.

IQM thesis for this strangle

The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for IQM extends from approximately $106.19 on the downside to $131.23 on the upside. A IQM long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current IQM IV rank near 72.57% sits in the upper third of its 1-year distribution, which historically reverts; this raises the bar for premium-buying structures and lowers it for premium-selling structures on IQM at 36.80%. As a Financial Services name, IQM options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to IQM-specific events.

IQM strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. IQM positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move IQM alongside the broader basket even when IQM-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current IQM chain quotes before placing a trade.

Frequently asked questions

What is a strangle on IQM?
A strangle on IQM is the strangle strategy applied to IQM (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With IQM etf trading near $118.71, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed IQM chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
How are IQM strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the IQM strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 36.80%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$429.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
What is the breakeven for a IQM strangle?
The breakeven for the IQM strangle priced on this page is roughly $110.71 and $129.29 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current IQM market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 10.55%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
When should you consider a strangle on IQM?
Strangles on IQM are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the IQM chain.
How does current IQM implied volatility affect this strangle?
IQM ATM IV is at 36.80% with IV rank near 72.57%, which is elevated relative to its 1-year range. Premium-selling structures (covered call, cash-secured put, iron condor) generally look more attractive when IV rank is high; premium-buying structures (long call, long put, debit spreads) are more expensive in that regime.

Related IQM analysis