IQM Butterfly Strategy
IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on CBOE.
The fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in equity securities inside and outside of the United States, including developing or emerging markets. The fund invests in companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines that the investment manager believes are substantially focused on/or are expected to substantially benefit from the ongoing technology-driven transformation of products, software, systems and machinery as well as product design, manufacture, logistics, distribution and maintenance, including through developments in artificial intelligence.
IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $67.2M, a beta of 1.59 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 67.19-115.19, average daily share volume of 8K, a public-listing history dating back to 2020. These structural characteristics shape how IQM etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 1.59 indicates IQM has historically moved more than the broader market, amplifying both the directional payoff and the realized volatility relative to an index-equivalent position.
What is a butterfly on IQM?
A long call butterfly buys one lower-strike call, sells two ATM calls, and buys one higher-strike call, paying a small net debit for a defined-risk position that maxes out if the underlying pins the middle strike at expiration.
Current IQM snapshot
As of May 15, 2026, spot at $112.86, ATM IV 30.90%, IV rank 53.51%, expected move 8.86%. The butterfly on IQM below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 34-day expiry.
Why this butterfly structure on IQM specifically: IQM IV at 30.90% is mid-range versus its 1-year history, so strategy selection should anchor more to the directional thesis than to the IV regime, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 8.86% (roughly $10.00 on the underlying). The 34-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated IQM expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on IQM should anchor to the underlying notional of $112.86 per share and to the trader's directional view on IQM etf.
IQM butterfly setup
The IQM butterfly below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With IQM near $112.86, the first option leg uses a $107.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed IQM chain at a 34-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 IQM shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $107.00 | $8.10 |
| Sell 2 | Call | $112.00 | $4.80 |
| Buy 1 | Call | $120.00 | $1.95 |
IQM butterfly risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$45.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- $425.21
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$345.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $107.30, $116.55
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- 1.232
Max profit equals the wing width minus net debit times 100 (reached when the underlying pins the middle strike); max loss equals the net debit times 100. Two breakevens at lower-wing plus debit and upper-wing minus debit.
IQM butterfly payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the butterfly on IQM. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | -$45.00 |
| $24.96 | -77.9% | -$45.00 |
| $49.92 | -55.8% | -$45.00 |
| $74.87 | -33.7% | -$45.00 |
| $99.82 | -11.6% | -$45.00 |
| $124.77 | +10.6% | -$345.00 |
| $149.73 | +32.7% | -$345.00 |
| $174.68 | +54.8% | -$345.00 |
| $199.63 | +76.9% | -$345.00 |
| $224.59 | +99.0% | -$345.00 |
When traders use butterfly on IQM
Butterflies on IQM are pinning bets - traders use them when they expect IQM to settle near a specific level at expiration (often the prior close, a round number, or the max-pain strike) and want defined-risk exposure to that outcome.
IQM thesis for this butterfly
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for IQM extends from approximately $102.86 on the downside to $122.86 on the upside. A IQM long call butterfly is a pinning play: it pays maximum at the middle strike if IQM settles there at expiration, with the wing legs capping both the cost and the maximum loss to the net debit. Current IQM IV rank near 53.51% is mid-range against its 1-year distribution, so the IV signal is neutral; the butterfly thesis on IQM should anchor more to the directional view and the expected-move geometry. As a Financial Services name, IQM options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to IQM-specific events.
IQM butterfly positions are structurally neutral / pin (limited-risk, limited-reward); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. IQM positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move IQM alongside the broader basket even when IQM-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current IQM chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a butterfly on IQM?
- A butterfly on IQM is the butterfly strategy applied to IQM (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / pin (limited-risk, limited-reward): A long call butterfly buys one lower-strike call, sells two ATM calls, and buys one higher-strike call, paying a small net debit for a defined-risk position that maxes out if the underlying pins the middle strike at expiration. With IQM etf trading near $112.86, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed IQM chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
- How are IQM butterfly max profit and max loss calculated?
- Max profit equals the wing width minus net debit times 100 (reached when the underlying pins the middle strike); max loss equals the net debit times 100. Two breakevens at lower-wing plus debit and upper-wing minus debit. For the IQM butterfly priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 30.90%), the computed maximum profit is $425.21 per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$345.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a IQM butterfly?
- The breakeven for the IQM butterfly priced on this page is roughly $107.30 and $116.55 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current IQM market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 8.86%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a butterfly on IQM?
- Butterflies on IQM are pinning bets - traders use them when they expect IQM to settle near a specific level at expiration (often the prior close, a round number, or the max-pain strike) and want defined-risk exposure to that outcome.
- How does current IQM implied volatility affect this butterfly?
- IQM ATM IV is at 30.90% with IV rank near 53.51%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.