INTW Strangle Strategy
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on NASDAQ.
The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 2 times (200%) the daily percentage change of the common stock of Intel Corp, (NASDAQ: INTC) There is no guarantee that the Fund will meet its stated objective. The fund should not be expected to provide 2 times the cumulative return of INTC for periods greater than a day.
INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $522.7M, a beta of 4.26 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 13.74-407.99, average daily share volume of 759K, a public-listing history dating back to 2025. These structural characteristics shape how INTW etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 4.26 indicates INTW has historically moved more than the broader market, amplifying both the directional payoff and the realized volatility relative to an index-equivalent position.
What is a strangle on INTW?
A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.
Current INTW snapshot
As of May 15, 2026, spot at $271.76, ATM IV 160.60%, IV rank 59.00%, expected move 46.04%. The strangle on INTW below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 34-day expiry.
Why this strangle structure on INTW specifically: INTW IV at 160.60% is mid-range versus its 1-year history, so strategy selection should anchor more to the directional thesis than to the IV regime, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 46.04% (roughly $125.13 on the underlying). The 34-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated INTW expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on INTW should anchor to the underlying notional of $271.76 per share and to the trader's directional view on INTW etf.
INTW strangle setup
The INTW strangle below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With INTW near $271.76, the first option leg uses a $285.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed INTW chain at a 34-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 INTW shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $285.00 | $48.90 |
| Buy 1 | Put | $260.00 | $45.00 |
INTW strangle risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$9,390.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- Unbounded
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$9,390.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $166.10, $378.90
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- Unbounded
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.
INTW strangle payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on INTW. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | +$16,609.00 |
| $60.10 | -77.9% | +$10,600.35 |
| $120.18 | -55.8% | +$4,591.69 |
| $180.27 | -33.7% | -$1,416.96 |
| $240.36 | -11.6% | -$7,425.61 |
| $300.44 | +10.6% | -$7,845.73 |
| $360.53 | +32.7% | -$1,837.08 |
| $420.62 | +54.8% | +$4,171.57 |
| $480.70 | +76.9% | +$10,180.23 |
| $540.79 | +99.0% | +$16,188.88 |
When traders use strangle on INTW
Strangles on INTW are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the INTW chain.
INTW thesis for this strangle
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for INTW extends from approximately $146.63 on the downside to $396.89 on the upside. A INTW long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current INTW IV rank near 59.00% is mid-range against its 1-year distribution, so the IV signal is neutral; the strangle thesis on INTW should anchor more to the directional view and the expected-move geometry. As a Financial Services name, INTW options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to INTW-specific events.
INTW strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. INTW positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move INTW alongside the broader basket even when INTW-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current INTW chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a strangle on INTW?
- A strangle on INTW is the strangle strategy applied to INTW (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With INTW etf trading near $271.76, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed INTW chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
- How are INTW strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
- Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the INTW strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 160.60%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$9,390.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a INTW strangle?
- The breakeven for the INTW strangle priced on this page is roughly $166.10 and $378.90 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current INTW market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 46.04%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a strangle on INTW?
- Strangles on INTW are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the INTW chain.
- How does current INTW implied volatility affect this strangle?
- INTW ATM IV is at 160.60% with IV rank near 59.00%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.