GRPM Butterfly Strategy
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management industry), listed on AMEX.
The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index (Index). The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index seeks to track companies with consistent fundamental growth, reasonable valuation, solid financial strength and strong earning power. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced semiannually after market close on the third Friday in June and December.
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management, with a market capitalization of approximately $475.1M, a beta of 1.08 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 101.93-128.42, average daily share volume of 20K, a public-listing history dating back to 2010. These structural characteristics shape how GRPM etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 1.08 places GRPM roughly in line with broader market moves, so the strategy payoff and realized volatility track the index-equivalent baseline. GRPM pays a dividend, which adjusts put-call parity and shifts the ex-dividend pricing across the listed chain.
What is a butterfly on GRPM?
A long call butterfly buys one lower-strike call, sells two ATM calls, and buys one higher-strike call, paying a small net debit for a defined-risk position that maxes out if the underlying pins the middle strike at expiration.
Current GRPM snapshot
As of May 15, 2026, spot at $124.20, ATM IV 20.60%, IV rank 34.30%, expected move 5.91%. The butterfly on GRPM below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 34-day expiry.
Why this butterfly structure on GRPM specifically: GRPM IV at 20.60% is mid-range versus its 1-year history, so strategy selection should anchor more to the directional thesis than to the IV regime, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 5.91% (roughly $7.34 on the underlying). The 34-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated GRPM expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on GRPM should anchor to the underlying notional of $124.20 per share and to the trader's directional view on GRPM etf.
GRPM butterfly setup
The GRPM butterfly below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With GRPM near $124.20, the first option leg uses a $118.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed GRPM chain at a 34-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 GRPM shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $118.00 | $7.70 |
| Sell 2 | Call | $124.00 | $3.35 |
| Buy 1 | Call | $130.00 | $0.97 |
GRPM butterfly risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$197.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- $361.09
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$197.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $119.97, $128.03
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- 1.833
Max profit equals the wing width minus net debit times 100 (reached when the underlying pins the middle strike); max loss equals the net debit times 100. Two breakevens at lower-wing plus debit and upper-wing minus debit.
GRPM butterfly payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the butterfly on GRPM. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | -$197.00 |
| $27.47 | -77.9% | -$197.00 |
| $54.93 | -55.8% | -$197.00 |
| $82.39 | -33.7% | -$197.00 |
| $109.85 | -11.6% | -$197.00 |
| $137.31 | +10.6% | -$197.00 |
| $164.77 | +32.7% | -$197.00 |
| $192.23 | +54.8% | -$197.00 |
| $219.69 | +76.9% | -$197.00 |
| $247.15 | +99.0% | -$197.00 |
When traders use butterfly on GRPM
Butterflies on GRPM are pinning bets - traders use them when they expect GRPM to settle near a specific level at expiration (often the prior close, a round number, or the max-pain strike) and want defined-risk exposure to that outcome.
GRPM thesis for this butterfly
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for GRPM extends from approximately $116.86 on the downside to $131.54 on the upside. A GRPM long call butterfly is a pinning play: it pays maximum at the middle strike if GRPM settles there at expiration, with the wing legs capping both the cost and the maximum loss to the net debit. Current GRPM IV rank near 34.30% is mid-range against its 1-year distribution, so the IV signal is neutral; the butterfly thesis on GRPM should anchor more to the directional view and the expected-move geometry. As a Financial Services name, GRPM options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to GRPM-specific events.
GRPM butterfly positions are structurally neutral / pin (limited-risk, limited-reward); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. GRPM positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move GRPM alongside the broader basket even when GRPM-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current GRPM chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a butterfly on GRPM?
- A butterfly on GRPM is the butterfly strategy applied to GRPM (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / pin (limited-risk, limited-reward): A long call butterfly buys one lower-strike call, sells two ATM calls, and buys one higher-strike call, paying a small net debit for a defined-risk position that maxes out if the underlying pins the middle strike at expiration. With GRPM etf trading near $124.20, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed GRPM chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
- How are GRPM butterfly max profit and max loss calculated?
- Max profit equals the wing width minus net debit times 100 (reached when the underlying pins the middle strike); max loss equals the net debit times 100. Two breakevens at lower-wing plus debit and upper-wing minus debit. For the GRPM butterfly priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 20.60%), the computed maximum profit is $361.09 per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$197.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a GRPM butterfly?
- The breakeven for the GRPM butterfly priced on this page is roughly $119.97 and $128.03 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current GRPM market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 5.91%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a butterfly on GRPM?
- Butterflies on GRPM are pinning bets - traders use them when they expect GRPM to settle near a specific level at expiration (often the prior close, a round number, or the max-pain strike) and want defined-risk exposure to that outcome.
- How does current GRPM implied volatility affect this butterfly?
- GRPM ATM IV is at 20.60% with IV rank near 34.30%, which is mid-range against its 1-year history. Strategy selection depends more on directional thesis and expected move than on a strong IV signal.