ProShares - Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

ProShares - Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management - Leveraged industry, with a market capitalization near $8.8M, listed on AMEX, carrying a beta of -0.76 to the broader market. ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. public since 2007-11-01.

Snapshot as of May 29, 2026.

Spot Price
$15.81
ATM IV
385.4%
IV Rank
80.1%
IV Percentile
99.6%
HV 20-Day
29.2%
IV Skew 25Δ
-1.958

As of May 29, 2026, ProShares - Short MSCI Emerging Markets (EUM) at $15.81 has an ATM IV of 385.4%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$17.47. IV rank is 80.1% (elevated, distribution priced wider than typical). IV percentile is 99.6%. The 25-delta skew is -1.958: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How EUM probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on ProShares - Short MSCI Emerging Markets options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 385.4% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the EUM probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where ProShares - Short MSCI Emerging Markets spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 385.4% and spot at $15.81, the 1σ band is approximately ±133.0% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 29.2% runs 356.2 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

EUM risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. EUM's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-1.958) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the EUM distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With EUM IV rank at 80.1%, the chain is pricing fatter tails than recent realized history; sellers earn the gap on average. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

Frequently asked EUM probability analysis questions

What is the EUM 30-day expected price range?
As of May 29, 2026, with EUM at $15.81 and ATM IV at 385.4%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$17.47, or about $-1.66 to $33.28. IV rank is elevated, so the priced distribution is wider than the 1-year typical width.
What does EUM risk-neutral density tell us?
Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future EUM price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does EUM ATM IV translate to a probability range?
ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.