DPST Strangle Strategy
DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X ETF), in the Financial Services sector, (Asset Management - Leveraged industry), listed on AMEX.
The Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. There is no guarantee the fund will achieve its stated investment objective.
DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X ETF) trades in the Financial Services sector, specifically Asset Management - Leveraged, with a market capitalization of approximately $788.0M, a beta of 3.74 versus the broader market, a 52-week range of 70.64-146.09, average daily share volume of 582K, a public-listing history dating back to 2015. These structural characteristics shape how DPST etf options price implied volatility around earnings windows, capital events, and macro-driven sector rotations.
A beta of 3.74 indicates DPST has historically moved more than the broader market, amplifying both the directional payoff and the realized volatility relative to an index-equivalent position. DPST pays a dividend, which adjusts put-call parity and shifts the ex-dividend pricing across the listed chain.
What is a strangle on DPST?
A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money.
Current DPST snapshot
As of May 15, 2026, spot at $102.42, ATM IV 69.88%, IV rank 7.94%, expected move 20.03%. The strangle on DPST below is built from the same end-of-day chain, with strikes snapped to listed contracts and premiums pulled from the bid/ask midpoint at a 28-day expiry.
Why this strangle structure on DPST specifically: DPST IV at 69.88% is on the cheap side of its 1-year range, which favors premium-buying structures like a DPST strangle, with a market-implied 1-standard-deviation move of approximately 20.03% (roughly $20.52 on the underlying). The 28-day window matched to the front-month expiry keeps theta exposure bounded while still capturing the post-snapshot move; longer-dated DPST expiries trade a higher absolute premium for lower per-day decay. Position sizing on DPST should anchor to the underlying notional of $102.42 per share and to the trader's directional view on DPST etf.
DPST strangle setup
The DPST strangle below is built from the end-of-day chain, with each option leg priced at the bid/ask midpoint of its listed strike. With DPST near $102.42, the first option leg uses a $108.00 strike; additional legs (when the strategy has them) anchor to spot-relative offsets. Premiums come from the bid/ask midpoint on the listed DPST chain at a 28-day expiry; the cross-strike IV skew is reflected directly in the per-leg values rather than approximated. Quantity sizing assumes one contract per option leg (or 100 DPST shares for the stock leg in covered calls and collars).
| Action | Type | Strike / Basis | Premium (est) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy 1 | Call | $108.00 | $4.70 |
| Buy 1 | Put | $97.00 | $5.15 |
DPST strangle risk and reward
- Net Premium / Debit
- -$985.00
- Max Profit (per contract)
- Unbounded
- Max Loss (per contract)
- -$985.00
- Breakeven(s)
- $87.15, $117.85
- Risk / Reward Ratio
- Unbounded
Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit.
DPST strangle payoff curve
Modeled P&L at expiration across a range of underlying prices for the strangle on DPST. Each row is one sampled price point from the computed payoff curve; the full curve uses 200 price points internally before being summarized into 10 rows here.
| Underlying Price | % From Spot | P&L at Expiration |
|---|---|---|
| $0.01 | -100.0% | +$8,714.00 |
| $22.65 | -77.9% | +$6,449.55 |
| $45.30 | -55.8% | +$4,185.10 |
| $67.94 | -33.7% | +$1,920.64 |
| $90.59 | -11.6% | -$343.81 |
| $113.23 | +10.6% | -$461.74 |
| $135.88 | +32.7% | +$1,802.71 |
| $158.52 | +54.8% | +$4,067.17 |
| $181.17 | +76.9% | +$6,331.62 |
| $203.81 | +99.0% | +$8,596.07 |
When traders use strangle on DPST
Strangles on DPST are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the DPST chain.
DPST thesis for this strangle
The market-implied 1-standard-deviation range for DPST extends from approximately $81.90 on the downside to $122.94 on the upside. A DPST long strangle is the OTM cousin of the straddle: lower up-front cost but the underlying has to travel further past either OTM strike before the position turns profitable at expiration. Current DPST IV rank near 7.94% sits in the lower third of its 1-year distribution, where IV often re-expands toward the mean; this favors premium-buying structures and disadvantages premium-selling structures on DPST at 69.88%. As a Financial Services name, DPST options can move on sector-level news flow (peer earnings, regulatory updates, industry-specific macro data) in addition to DPST-specific events.
DPST strangle positions are structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM); the modeled P&L assumes European-style exercise at expiration and ignores early assignment, transaction costs, dividends paid before expiry on the stock leg (when present), and the bid-ask spread on the listed chain. DPST positions also carry Financial Services sector concentration risk; news flow inside the sector (peer earnings, regulatory shifts, supply-chain headlines) can move DPST alongside the broader basket even when DPST-specific fundamentals are unchanged. Always rebuild the position from current DPST chain quotes before placing a trade.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a strangle on DPST?
- A strangle on DPST is the strangle strategy applied to DPST (etf). The strategy is structurally neutral / high-volatility (long premium, OTM): A long strangle buys an OTM call and an OTM put at offset strikes, cheaper than a straddle but requiring a larger underlying move to profit since both wings start out-of-the-money. With DPST etf trading near $102.42, the strikes shown on this page are snapped to the nearest listed DPST chain strike and the premiums come straight from the end-of-day bid/ask midpoint.
- How are DPST strangle max profit and max loss calculated?
- Upside max profit is unbounded; downside max profit is bounded at the put strike minus the combined debit (reached at zero). Max loss equals the combined debit times 100 (reached anywhere between the two OTM strikes). Two breakevens at call-strike plus debit and put-strike minus debit. For the DPST strangle priced from the end-of-day chain at a 30-day expiry (ATM IV 69.88%), the computed maximum profit is unbounded per contract and the computed maximum loss is -$985.00 per contract. Live intraday quotes will differ as the chain moves through the trading session.
- What is the breakeven for a DPST strangle?
- The breakeven for the DPST strangle priced on this page is roughly $87.15 and $117.85 at expiration, derived from end-of-day chain premiums. Breakeven is the underlying price at which the strategy's P&L crosses zero ignoring transaction costs and assignment risk. The current DPST market-implied 1-standard-deviation expected move is approximately 20.03%; if the move sits well outside the breakeven distance, the structure's risk-reward becomes correspondingly tighter.
- When should you consider a strangle on DPST?
- Strangles on DPST are the cheaper cousin of the straddle - traders use them when they want a large directional move but are willing to give up the inner-strike sensitivity in exchange for a lower up-front debit on the DPST chain.
- How does current DPST implied volatility affect this strangle?
- DPST ATM IV is at 69.88% with IV rank near 7.94%, which is on the low end of its 1-year range. Premium-buying structures (long call, long put, debit spreads) are relatively cheap in this regime; premium-selling structures collect less credit per unit risk.