What is the DIG 30-day expected price range?

As of Jul 15, 2026, with DIG at $55.10 and ATM IV at 50.9%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$8.04, or about $47.06 to $63.14.

What does DIG risk-neutral density tell us?

Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future DIG price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.

How does DIG ATM IV translate to a probability range?

ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.

ProShares - Ultra Energy (DIG) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

ProShares - Ultra Energy (DIG) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management - Leveraged industry, with a market capitalization near $63.0M, listed on AMEX, carrying a beta of -0.03 to the broader market. The ProShares Ultra Energy fund is engineered to offer daily returns that are double the daily performance of the S&P Energy Select Sector Index. public since 2007-02-01.

Snapshot as of Jul 15, 2026.

Spot Price: $55.10
ATM IV: 50.9%
IV Rank: 54.1%
IV Percentile: 55.6%
HV 20-Day: 44.9%
IV Skew 25Δ: -0.085

As of Jul 15, 2026, ProShares - Ultra Energy (DIG) at $55.10 has an ATM IV of 50.9%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$8.04. IV rank is 54.1% (near its 1-year median). IV percentile is 55.6%. The 25-delta skew is -0.085: downside tail priced richer than upside, biasing probability mass below spot. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How DIG probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on ProShares - Ultra Energy options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 50.9% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the DIG probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where ProShares - Ultra Energy spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 50.9% and spot at $55.10, the 1σ band is approximately ±17.6% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 44.9% runs 6.0 vol points below the current implied, suggesting the chain is pricing more dispersion than the underlying has been delivering.

DIG risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. DIG's put-skewed 25-delta surface (-0.085) means downside risk-neutral probabilities are higher than upside - the empirical bias is well-documented. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the DIG distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

Frequently asked DIG probability analysis questions

What is the DIG 30-day expected price range?: As of Jul 15, 2026, with DIG at $55.10 and ATM IV at 50.9%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$8.04, or about $47.06 to $63.14.
What does DIG risk-neutral density tell us?: Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future DIG price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does DIG ATM IV translate to a probability range?: ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.