What is the BRF 30-day expected price range?

As of May 29, 2026, with BRF at $17.66 and ATM IV at 21.6%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$1.09, or about $16.57 to $18.75. IV rank is subdued, so the priced distribution is tighter than the 1-year typical width.

What does BRF risk-neutral density tell us?

Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future BRF price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.

How does BRF ATM IV translate to a probability range?

ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.

VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) Probability Analysis

Probability analysis extracts the risk-neutral probability distribution implied by option prices. It shows the market-implied likelihood of the underlying reaching various price levels by expiration.

VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) operates in the Financial Services sector, specifically the Asset Management - Global industry, with a market capitalization near $25.4M, listed on AMEX, carrying a beta of 1.26 to the broader market. VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index (MVBRFTR), which includes securities of small capitalization companies that are incorporated in Brazil or that are incorporated outside of Brazil but have at least 50% of their revenues/related assets in Brazil. public since 2009-05-14.

Snapshot as of May 29, 2026.

Spot Price: $17.66
ATM IV: 21.6%
IV Rank: 1.9%
IV Percentile: 25.4%
HV 20-Day: 34.7%
IV Skew 25Δ: 0.007

As of May 29, 2026, VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) at $17.66 has an ATM IV of 21.6%, implying a 30-day one-standard-deviation range of approximately ±$1.09. IV rank is 1.9% (subdued, distribution priced tighter than usual). IV percentile is 25.4%. The 25-delta skew is +0.007: roughly symmetric wings. Under lognormal assumptions roughly 68% of outcomes fall within ±1σ and 95% within ±2σ; risk-neutral probability analysis refines this by extracting the market-implied distribution directly from options prices, capturing the fat tails that real markets exhibit.

How BRF probability analysis Data Feeds Strategy Selection

Strategy selection on VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF options does not derive from any single metric in isolation. The probability analysis view above sits inside a broader read: ATM IV currently sits at 21.6% and dealer gamma exposure is positive, so dealer hedging is mechanically mean-reverting. Combine the probability analysis data here with the volatility-skew surface, dealer-gamma exposure, max-pain level, and upcoming-events calendar to build a positioning thesis. Risk-defined structures (credit spreads, debit spreads, iron condors) are usually safer than naked positions while the regime is uncertain; the data on this page anchors the inputs but does not by itself constitute a trade thesis.

How to read the BRF probability distribution

The probability cone above is the option-market-implied distribution of where VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF spot could end up at expiration. It's derived from the implied-volatility surface via a risk-neutral pricing transformation, not from historical realized returns. With ATM IV at 21.6% and spot at $17.66, the 1σ band is approximately ±7.5% over a 30-day horizon. Recent realized HV-20 of 34.7% runs 13.1 vol points above current implied, an inverted regime where premium buyers are underpaying.

BRF risk-neutral vs real-world probabilities

The probabilities derived from option prices reflect the market's risk-adjusted view, not the realized statistical distribution. Risk-neutral probabilities include the equity risk premium and skew preferences priced into options, so they tend to overstate tail probability and understate upside drift relative to actually-realized outcomes. For probability-of-touch calculations and assignment-risk modeling, risk-neutral is the right benchmark. For position-sizing your own conviction, blend with realized-volatility-based statistics from the HV columns.

Trading the BRF distribution

Probability-driven strategies aim to capture mispricings between the implied distribution and your own probability assessment. Premium-selling structures (credit spreads, iron condors, cash-secured puts) profit when the implied distribution overprices tail probability relative to realized; premium-buying (debit spreads, long calls/puts, long straddles) profits in the reverse. With BRF IV rank at 1.9%, the chain is pricing tighter tails than recent realized history; buyers get cheaper optionality but need a real catalyst to monetize. Always pair probability-driven strategy selection with a stop loss or wing-defined risk - the implied distribution is a snapshot, and regime shifts can invalidate it intraday.

Learn how risk-neutral density is reported and how to read the data →

Frequently asked BRF probability analysis questions

What is the BRF 30-day expected price range?: As of May 29, 2026, with BRF at $17.66 and ATM IV at 21.6%, the implied 30-day one-standard-deviation range is approximately ±$1.09, or about $16.57 to $18.75. IV rank is subdued, so the priced distribution is tighter than the 1-year typical width.
What does BRF risk-neutral density tell us?: Risk-neutral density is the probability distribution of future BRF price implied by listed option prices. Extracted via Breeden-Litzenberger (twice-differentiating the call price function with respect to strike), it represents the pricing kernel rather than the real-world probability of outcomes. Persistent skew or fat-tail features in the density reflect how the market is pricing tail risk.
How does BRF ATM IV translate to a probability range?: ATM IV is annualized; multiplying by sqrt(t/365) scales it to the chosen tenor. Under lognormal assumptions, the resulting standard deviation defines the ±1σ band that contains roughly 68% of outcomes, ±2σ for 95%. Empirical equity returns have fatter tails than log-normal, so the implied tail probabilities under-state realized tail frequency in stressed regimes.