Options Strategy Builder

Last reviewed: by .

Design, analyze, and compare multi-leg options strategies with real-time pricing and risk metrics. Choose from 45+ pre-built strategies or construct custom positions. Black-Scholes pricing is free. Advanced models and features are available with a Professional subscription. Open the strategy builder.

Why Multi-Leg Greeks Aggregation Matters

A two-leg vertical spread is not just two contracts side-by-side. Its Greeks profile is qualitatively different from either leg alone. The long leg contributes positive gamma while the short leg contributes negative gamma, and the net gamma flips sign as spot moves across the spread. The Strategy Builder computes net Delta, Gamma, Theta, Vega, and the higher-order Greeks across all legs simultaneously, so you can see what the position actually looks like to the market, not what it looks like as a sum of leg-level line items.

Workflow: Building a Trade from a Thesis

Typical pattern: start with a directional or volatility thesis, pick a template that matches (covered call for income on a holding, put credit spread for moderate bullishness, iron condor for neutral with vol contraction), and adjust the strikes and expirations to match your conviction level. Read the aggregated Greeks to confirm the position's risk profile aligns with the thesis. A "neutral" iron condor that's actually delta-positive is masking directional exposure you didn't intend. Then check the payoff diagram for breakeven points and max-loss boundaries, run what-if sweeps on volatility and time, and compare against a few alternatives before committing.

Exotic Strategy Insight Cards

When you select an exotic model (Asian, Barrier, Lookback, Digital, Compound, Chooser, or Multi-Asset) on a single-leg strategy, an insight card appears that compares the exotic price against a vanilla Black-Scholes reference and surfaces the trading question the exotic was built to answer: DCA vs lump sum for Asian, stop-loss cost analysis for Barrier, trailing-stop trail-width comparisons for Lookback, prediction-market fair probability for Digital, buy-now-vs-wait timing for Compound, straddle-vs-chooser capital efficiency for Chooser, and basket correlation sensitivity for Multi-Asset. This turns exotic pricing from an academic exercise into a workflow that maps onto real trade decisions.

Picking a Template by Thesis

The pre-built strategy library maps onto thesis types in a fairly predictable way. Directional bullish with moderate IV: long call, bull call spread, or short put. Directional bullish with high IV: bull put (put credit) spread or covered call, pairing the directional view with selling expensive premium. Directional bearish with moderate IV: long put, bear put spread, or short call. Neutral with vol contraction expected: iron condor, iron butterfly, or short strangle. Neutral with vol expansion expected: long straddle, long strangle, or calendar (short near, long far). Earnings or event window: calendar spreads to harvest IV crush, or directional verticals if the event direction is clear. With more than 45 templates organized by category (basic, intermediate, advanced, synthetic, and combination), picking the closest fit and then refining strikes is faster than building each leg from scratch.

Modeling Adjustments by Editing Legs

Strategy management often matters more than strategy selection, and the builder lets you model an adjustment before committing to it. There is no dedicated "roll" or "convert" button; instead you work directly with the leg list. To roll a tested short put down-and-out, edit its strike and expiration. To convert a vertical into an iron condor, add the opposite-side credit spread as new legs. To convert a covered call into a collar, add a downside long put. As soon as the legs change, the aggregated Greeks and the payoff curve recompute, so you can see whether the adjustment improves the position's risk profile or just shifts the breakeven without addressing the original problem. The leg-level controls cover add, remove, duplicate, and flip long/short, which together express any adjustment you would model by hand.

Comparing Alternatives Before Committing

When the thesis is clear but the structure is not, the practical workflow is to build a candidate, read its aggregated Greeks, payoff diagram, and what-if sweeps, then rebuild it as the next candidate and compare the readings. For example, "I am moderately bullish on this name and want defined risk" admits long calls, bull call spreads, ratio call spreads, short puts, and put credit spreads. Stepping through each surfaces how expected payoff, max loss, and vol sensitivity differ at your target price. This comparison is most informative when the alternatives all share the same thesis; comparing structures across different theses (a covered call vs a long put) just confirms they have different risk profiles, which is already obvious.

This page is part of the Options Analysis Suite features overview. Browse the full documentation.